Mitt Romney’s new spokesman is gay and it doesn’t seem to have been a big deal.
A few people have patted Romney on the back for hiring Richard Grenell (The Atlantic called it a milestone) and a few took jabs (the National Review said Grenell’s work on gay marriage shows he has “questionable judgement“), but for the most part, there was no widespread conservative outcry about Grenell being on board.
Bill Scher at Blogging Heads wonders if the lack of outrage is indicative of a newly accepting GOP:
“Is it a new day for gay conservatives? It wasn’t all that long ago that one of Bush’s top aides, Ken Mehlman, stayed in the closet … You could argue [Romey] has made this hire and it has not caused a revolt on the right.”
While I do think gay issues will eventually drop from the GOP’s radar, Grenell’s hiring and the reaction to it is not evidence thereof.
The reason there was no revolt when Romney hired a gay staffer is because in order to revolt, one has to already be part of the entity being revolted against. That is, the Republicans who staunchly oppose gay rights (and homosexuality in general) are not in the Romney camp. They’re disillusioned that a social conservative isn’t going to win the nomination and they’re still mulling whether they’ll go to the polls in November at all. These Republicans already see Romney as liberal on social issues (rightfully so, probably) so they don’t have any reason to get worked up when he reinforces that.


